Noether in field theory — conserved currents and the stress–energy tensor
Noether in field theory — conserved currents and the stress–energy tensor
Wherever a continuous symmetry lives, a conserved current follows — a first encounter with the U(1) 4-current of a complex scalar and the stress–energy tensor generated by spacetime translations.
Opening
Noether’s theorem made its first appearance in Analytical Mechanics I as a one-line statement: if the Lagrangian is invariant under a continuous transformation, a conserved quantity exists. Back then we saw the particle-mechanics flavour — time translation gives energy, spatial translation gives momentum, rotation gives angular momentum. In this chapter we rewrite the same theorem on infinitely many degrees of freedom, i.e. on a field . The output is no longer a single conserved number but a conserved current (with a 4-spacetime index) spread over spacetime. By the end of the chapter you will be able to derive, with your own pen, the two slogans that open every QFT textbook: U(1) symmetry implies charge conservation, and spacetime translation invariance implies energy–momentum conservation. Throughout the chapter we use natural units and, consistent with chapter 6, the Minkowski metric .
Main 1 — Noether for fields, statement and one-line proof
For a field (with ) the action is the spacetime integral of a Lagrangian density . Suppose under an infinitesimal transformation the Lagrangian changes by a total divergence, i.e. for some . The variation then leaves the action invariant up to a boundary term, so the transformation is a symmetry. The associated conserved current is
On any solution of the Euler–Lagrange (EL) equations, . The corresponding conserved charge is
and satisfies .
One-line proof. Expand and use the Leibniz rule to rewrite
The bracket on the right is exactly the EL equation, so it vanishes on solutions. The remaining identity reads ; moving everything to one side gives for the above. That single rearrangement is the whole ladder from “symmetry” to “conserved current” in field theory.
Main 2 — U(1) example: complex scalar and the 4-current
For a complex scalar field the simplest Lorentz-invariant Lagrangian is
where is the field’s mass (dimension length in natural units). This Lagrangian is exactly invariant under the phase rotation , for any real , since both and are -independent. The group of these one-parameter rotations is called U(1).
The infinitesimal form (take ) is , . Because the Lagrangian is strictly invariant we have . Plugging into the formula of Main 1 gives
This single line is the seed of what QFT calls the “charge 4-current.” On a plane-wave solution (with the complex amplitude, the angular frequency, the wavevector, and the dispersion relation ),
So the 4-current is directly proportional to the 4-momentum . The takeaway is that the non-relativistic “probability current ” of Schrödinger theory, lifted to a relativistic field, packages into precisely these four components. A subtle sign warning: can be either positive or negative, so it cannot serve as a probability density directly — QFT eventually reinterprets it as the charge density of particles minus antiparticles.
Main 3 — Spacetime translations and the stress–energy tensor
Spacetime translations are also symmetries of any Poincaré-invariant . Because the parameter has four components (), four conserved currents emerge simultaneously and naturally bundle into a rank-2 tensor . Applying the Main 1 formula carefully (with and ) yields
with holding for every on solutions. This object is the (canonical) stress–energy tensor.
The physical content of each component is the following. is the energy density. is the momentum density (equivalently, the energy flux divided by , which equals it in natural units). is the rate at which the -component of momentum flows in the -direction — the stress. The four conservation laws split into , which is energy conservation, and , which is momentum conservation. The very same appears on the right-hand side of Einstein’s field equation in general relativity; a formal derivation is deferred to the next chapter.
In Python
# Verify that the U(1) conserved current j^0 on a plane wave equals 2 omega |A|^2,
# then check that the charge Q = ∫ j^0 dx is independent of time.
import numpy as np
A = 0.7
omega = 2.0
k = 1.6
m = 1.2 # omega^2 - k^2 = 4.0 - 2.56 = 1.44 = m^2 -> OK
x = np.linspace(-10.0, 10.0, 200)
dx = x[1] - x[0]
ts = [0.0, 0.5, 1.0]
expected = 2.0 * omega * abs(A)**2 # = 2.8
print(f"theory j^0 = 2 omega |A|^2 = {expected:.4f}")
Q_history = []
for t in ts:
phase = -(omega * t - k * x)
phi = A * np.exp(1j * phase) # complex plane wave
# Analytic time derivative is d phi / dt = -i*omega*phi.
# We compute it numerically with a small dt to mimic measurement.
dt = 1e-4
phi_p = A * np.exp(1j * (-(omega*(t+dt) - k*x)))
dphidt = (phi_p - phi) / dt
j0 = 1j * (np.conj(phi) * dphidt - phi * np.conj(dphidt))
j0 = j0.real # imaginary part is numerical zero
Q = np.trapezoid(j0, x)
print(f"t={t:.1f}: mean j^0 = {j0.mean():.4f}, std = {j0.std():.2e}, Q = {Q:.4f}")
Q_history.append(Q)
print(f"Q drift = {max(Q_history) - min(Q_history):.2e} (conserved if <= ~1e-3)")
If the mean stays near , the standard deviation is at numerical-noise level, and the time drift of sits below , then the theoretical identity has survived intact on the discrete grid.
To the next chapter
Chapter 9: From classical to quantum lifts the conserved current and the stress–energy tensor obtained here to operators in the quantisation procedure, and shows how the conserved charge is reinterpreted as a particle-number operator. The fact that Noether’s theorem is one of the sturdiest bridges between classical and quantum physics should be entirely tangible by the end of that chapter.