Perturbation theory — KAM and resonance

Add a small perturbation to an integrable Hamiltonian and most invariant tori survive — but resonant ones break. How integrability fails, gently.

Opening

In Chapter 3 we saw how an integrable Hamiltonian system, written in action–angle variables (J,θ)(J, \theta), foliates phase space into a stack of invariant tori. But almost no system in nature is integrable. Are integrable models therefore just textbook scaffolding? The KAM theorem (Kolmogorov–Arnold–Moser) gives a surprisingly sharp answer. By the end of this chapter the reader should be able to (1) explain why a small perturbation preserves most tori while ruthlessly destroying a few, and (2) state in a single sentence why “resonance” links a child’s swing, a forced oscillator, and the long-term stability of the solar system through the same mechanism.

Main 1 — The setup and the small-divisor problem

Begin with an integrable Hamiltonian H0(J)H_0(J). The actions J=(J1,,Jn)J = (J_1, \dots, J_n) are constants of motion, and each angle θi\theta_i winds at a fixed angular frequency

ωi(J)=H0Ji\omega_i(J) = \frac{\partial H_0}{\partial J_i}

so each trajectory is a straight line on an nn-dimensional torus. Now add a small perturbation:

H(J,θ)=H0(J)+ϵH1(J,θ)H(J, \theta) = H_0(J) + \epsilon\, H_1(J, \theta)

where ϵ\epsilon (epsilon, a small dimensionless parameter) satisfies ϵ1|\epsilon| \ll 1. The naive hope is that the new motion lives on slightly deformed tori with slightly shifted frequencies. Follow that hope formally and the perturbation series for the new tori develops, term by term, the following denominator:

1kω,k=(k1,,kn)Zn{0}\frac{1}{\vec k \cdot \vec\omega}, \quad \vec k = (k_1, \dots, k_n) \in \mathbb{Z}^n \setminus \{0\}

If the frequency vector ω=(ω1,,ωn)\vec\omega = (\omega_1, \dots, \omega_n) is rationally commensurate — that is, kω=0\vec k \cdot \vec\omega = 0 for some nonzero integer k\vec k — that term diverges outright. Even when ω\vec\omega is incommensurate, kω\vec k \cdot \vec\omega can be made arbitrarily small by choosing larger k\vec k. This is the small-divisor problem that confronted Poincaré in the nineteenth century and stalled the subject for fifty years.

Main 2 — The resonance condition

For a two-degree-of-freedom system, the frequencies ω1,ω2\omega_1, \omega_2 are in resonance when

mω1+nω2=0,(m,n)Z2{(0,0)}m\, \omega_1 + n\, \omega_2 = 0, \quad (m, n) \in \mathbb{Z}^2 \setminus \{(0,0)\}

for some integer pair (m,n)(m,n) not both zero. At resonance the effect of the perturbation does not time-average to zero; it accumulates linearly in time. The mechanism is familiar — push a swing at its natural frequency and the amplitude grows linearly with tt, exactly as a forced simple harmonic oscillator at its natural frequency exhibits a response proportional to tt. The new feature in many-degree-of-freedom systems is that the resonance lattice is dense in phase space, so along every rational direction one torus is broken.

In place of a broken torus, resonance islands appear, separated by thin chaotic layers. The width of those layers shrinks as a positive power of ϵ\epsilon, so for small ϵ\epsilon they occupy only a tiny fraction of the stage.

Main 3 — KAM in one paragraph

Kolmogorov announced the theorem in 1954; Arnold (1963) and Moser (1962) completed it. The statement: if H0H_0 is non-degenerate, meaning the frequency map has non-vanishing Jacobian,

det ⁣(2H0JiJj)0\det\!\left( \frac{\partial^2 H_0}{\partial J_i\, \partial J_j} \right) \ne 0

and H1H_1 is sufficiently smooth, then for sufficiently small ϵ\epsilon most invariant tori survive. Precisely: a torus survives whenever its frequency vector ω\vec\omega satisfies a Diophantine condition — there exist constants γ,τ>0\gamma, \tau > 0 such that

kωγkτ,kZn{0}|\vec k \cdot \vec\omega| \ge \gamma\, |\vec k|^{-\tau}, \quad \forall\, \vec k \in \mathbb{Z}^n \setminus \{0\}

The surviving tori form a Cantor-like set of positive measure in phase space — dense but full of gaps. Those gaps are exactly where the broken resonant tori once lived, and they are filled with chaotic motion.

The physical conclusion is sharp. Integrability is fragile — any perturbation breaks it. But the breaking is not catastrophic: as ϵ0\epsilon \to 0 the measure of surviving tori tends to one. This is the first clue to why the solar system has behaved as if nearly integrable for billions of years, and at the same time it is the finger that points to where chaos enters.

In Python

We drive a pendulum, H=p2/2+cosq0.1cos(ωdt)H = p^2/2 + \cos q - 0.1\cos(\omega_d t), with RK4 and sweep the driving frequency ωd\omega_d. The small-angle natural frequency is ωnat=1\omega_{\text{nat}} = 1; the response should peak nearby.

import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt

# Driven pendulum: dq/dt = p, dp/dt = -sin(q) + 0.1*sin(wd*t)
# Derived from H = p^2/2 + cos(q) - 0.1*cos(wd*t)
def deriv(t, y, wd):
    q, p = y
    return np.array([p, -np.sin(q) + 0.1 * np.sin(wd * t)])

def rk4(y0, t, wd):
    y = np.zeros((len(t), 2)); y[0] = y0
    for i in range(len(t) - 1):
        h = t[i+1] - t[i]
        k1 = deriv(t[i],       y[i],          wd)
        k2 = deriv(t[i] + h/2, y[i] + h*k1/2, wd)
        k3 = deriv(t[i] + h/2, y[i] + h*k2/2, wd)
        k4 = deriv(t[i] + h,   y[i] + h*k3,   wd)
        y[i+1] = y[i] + h * (k1 + 2*k2 + 2*k3 + k4) / 6
    return y

t = np.linspace(0, 200, 4001)
wds = np.linspace(0.5, 2.0, 20)
amps = [np.max(np.abs(rk4(np.array([0.1, 0.0]), t, wd)[:, 0])) for wd in wds]

plt.plot(wds, amps, 'o-')
plt.axvline(1.0, color='r', ls='--', label=r'$\omega_{\rm nat}=1$')
plt.xlabel(r'$\omega_d$'); plt.ylabel(r'max $|q(t)|$')
plt.legend(); plt.show()

A peak near ωd1\omega_d \approx 1 is the linear-in-time accumulation of Main 2 made tactile.

To the next chapter

Chapter 5: Extension to continuum mechanics lifts the finite-degree Hamiltonian picture to fields — infinite degrees of freedom. Mode amplitudes take the place of action–angle variables; infinite-dimensional phase space takes the place of the torus. The intuition from this chapter — most survives, a measure-zero minority breaks — returns in field theory, although in considerably more delicate form.